Search for: "GATES v. STATE"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2016, 4:28 am
Marcia Dempe, et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
It is now clear that the subjects in charge of collecting the fair compensation for private copying (e.g. collective management organisations) can bring proceedings before the courts of the Member State where the harm arising from missed payments is felt. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
As the Court later explained in Baker v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 11:04 am
"Citizen's United v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 5:10 pm
The Indiana Supreme Court in Wall v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:08 am
She later suffered a work-related concussion when a remotely operated metal gate struck her in the forehead. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 2:53 am
According to court records in Nestor v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 am
Rufe is a judge on the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
And 10,000 more are coming…* CJEU on taser, ahm, tacit prorogation of jurisdictionMark pens of Taser International Inc. v SC Gate 4 Business SRL and Others (Case C-175/15), a decision where the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) addressed the issue of whether Article 24 of Brussels I Regulation applies in cases where one party is domiciled in a non-EU Member State. * Two Book Reviews: European Law Design and The Changing European PatentDavid reviews… [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 9:19 am
In the case, Acosta v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 10:20 am
In 2008, Taser International concluded an agreement with the Romanian company Gate 4 which obliged Gate 4 to assign to Taser International the Taser trade marks which Gate 4 had registered, or for which it had applied for registration, in Romania. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:15 am
Here are the materials in Wilson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:38 pm
One of the hackers is also charged with seeking to gain control of New York state infrastructure (U.S. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:17 pm
In Habeas Corpus Resource Center v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:56 am
However, in Parhat v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:56 am
However, in Parhat v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
Although famous for his workshop talents, Edison would be better understood as an early Bill Gates, his business success built on a keen appreciation of the power of aggressive intellectual property strategy and the frailty of antitrust law. n3Of the patent interference:Between 1880 and 1883, the competitors were embroiled in a hard-fought priority battle at the U.S. patent office over which team had been first to achieve a key insight. n89 The dispute went against Edison, and the issuance… [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 8:55 am
Inc. v. [read post]
