Search for: "GENERAL MOTORS CORP" Results 761 - 780 of 1,433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2016, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
General Motors Corp., Chevrolet Motor Division, 69 Ill.App. 2d 72, 216 N.E. 2d 244 (1966), and its progeny, in that the district court judge concluded that product liability claims fail under Illinois law when the plaintiff does not present the allegedly defective product itself or at least other permissible evidence that the product was defective. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 General Motors Corp., 624 F.2d 1373 (5th Cir. 1980) Alexander v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 1:22 pm by Race to the Bottom
Nikola went public in June of 2020 by merging with a SPAC company backed by former General Motors (“GM”) Vice Chairman, Steve Girsky. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:14 am by Sean Wajert
Apr. 21, 2010); In re General Motors Corp. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
Fleetwood Motor Homes of Indiana, 480 F.3d 695, 699 (5th Cir. 2007) (applying Louisiana law). [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 11:28 am by IncNow
Ford Motor Co. established this principle when defendant Henry Ford progressively lowered the prices of his cars and withheld dividends from stockholders when he learned of the Dodge brothers’ plan to cash out their shares in Ford Motor and start their own car company. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:40 pm by IncNow
Ford Motor Co. established this principle when defendant Henry Ford progressively lowered the prices of his cars and withheld dividends from stockholders when he learned of the Dodge brothers’ plan to cash out their shares in Ford Motor and start their own car company. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am by Law Lady
Dissolution of marriage -- Child support -- Trial court erred in ordering that parties be equally responsible for payment of all non-covered medical expenses for children where this allocation conflicts with allocation of parties' relative financial responsibility for child support -- As general rule, if non-covered medical expenses are ordered to be separately paid, absent some logically established rationale in the final judgment to the contrary, they must be allocated in the same… [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am by Bexis
  After reviewing the evidence . . . we hold the evidence of conscious indifference is not legally sufficient.General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:59 am by Joy Waltemath
Johnson argued that the majority failed to show that a drastic departure from the current policy was necessary, and that by taking such a radical revamp, the majority was substantially returning to the regressive approach taken in Suburban Motor Freight, which was overturned in Olin Corp. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:18 pm
 Read MoreEPA and Corps Jointly Issue Rapanos GuidanceOn June 5, 2007, the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers jointly issued guidance consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Rapanos. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:50 pm by Tobias Lutzi
Ginsburg had an opportunity to revisit a similar question about thirty years later, when delivering the opinion of the Court in Baker v General Motor Corp (522 US 222 (1998)). [read post]