Search for: "Graham v. United States" Results 761 - 780 of 1,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 7:32 am by Dan Markel
Farber (Northeastern University) Privacy in the Workplace: City of Ontario v Quon *Clifford S Fishman (Catholic University of America) Consent-To-Search and Dignity *Josephine Ross (Howard University) Abstract: This country is at a crossroads regarding privacy. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:58 am by Michael O'Hear
  As originally introduced, the FSA would have equalized the treatment of crack and powder[7]—which is precisely what is done in the great majority of states.[8] Although powder cocaine sentencing provides the most natural benchmark to assess the proportionality of crack sentencing, it is not the only benchmark that should be borne in mind. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:33 pm by Orin Kerr
The latest contribution to the Second Circuit’s reversal docket is a 400-page sentencing opinion from earlier this week, United States v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:04 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
“We arrive at our holding by applying the two-step approach employed by the United States Supreme Court, most recently in Graham v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:48 pm by Tim Armstrong
Texaco (the existence of a licensing market is itself probative of unfair use) without Bill Graham Archives v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:55 pm
Argument was held on May 10, 2011 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Liberty University, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:25 am by Steve Bainbridge
“The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the litigious environment are creating a more risk-averse culture in the United States,” one former senior investment banker stated. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
I'm writing now to report that on March 21, 2011 the United States Supreme Court denied petitions for certiorari in Portalatin v. [read post]