Search for: "Herring v. Campbell" Results 761 - 780 of 1,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2008, 8:19 am
Campbell, reduced the punitive award to $55 million.Ford's petition for review to the Cal Supremes was denied. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 6:15 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
Co. v Campbell (538 US 408 [2003]), and Gomez v Cabatic (159 AD3d 62 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  Both Peck v United Kingdom (2003) 36 EHRR 41(in which in the moments preceding the claimant’s suicide attempt were caught on CCTV and broadcast on television) and Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 (where the defendant published photos of the claimant outside a Narcotics Anonymous meeting) have been cited with approval in New Zealand courts. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
What does Brexit mean for data protection: part 2 The Panopticon Blog has a post about the case of Campbell v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2018] UKUT 372 (AAC) – Death and the DPA. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Campbell Newman has lodged a claim against broadcaster Alan Jones, relating to comments he made about the Newman government’s approval of a mine expansion. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
(Techdirt)   India Warner loses Hari Puttar case before Delhi High Court for delay in taking action and suppression of material facts (SPICY IP) (IPKat) (Techdirt) (SPICY IP) (Innovationpartners) Delay in evidence suffocates trade mark opposition: Pidilite Industries Limited v Registrar of Trademarks (International Law Office) Delhi High Court rules in Wipro's favour in its trade mark infringement action against local Delhi company (RelatIP) Delhi High Court: Mattel… [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The architect Zaha Hadid has settled her case against the New York Review of Books and critic Martin Filler. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On Twitter, Campbell said: “Genuinely shocked someone has seen fit to leak my statement to Leveson. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:01 am by Schachtman
Judge Campbell found that Betensky had explained her assumptions, had acknowledged shortcomings, and had engaged in various sensitivity tests of the validity of her DPA; and so he concluded that Betensky did not present “a case where ‘there is simply too great an analytical gap between the data and the opinion proffered’. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm by INFORRM
This concerned the Mail Online’s (briefly published) inaccurate story announcing a ‘Guilty’ verdict in the Amanda Knox trial, when in fact Knox won her appeal against her conviction for murder. [read post]