Search for: "MATTER OF M R L" Results 761 - 780 of 2,160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
” I’m delighted to report that leading Internet lawyer Venkat Balasubramani (Focal Law LLC) and I have filed a lawsuit challenging this statute. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
C'est qu'en effet, le droit des brevets confère un monopole limité pour permettre au titulaire de bénéficier de la récompense financière qu'il mérite, promouvant ainsi l'innovation. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 7:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As an initial matter, the parties seem to agree that, as recited in claim 1, the fine pulverization and particle classification are sub-steps of the umbrella "second pulverization step. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:51 pm
Le Département d'état s'est prononcé dans le même sens. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by Marta Requejo
The book is adapted from an analytical framework that was developed in a book written in French by Jean-Sylvestre Bergé, L’application du droit national, international et européen, Paris: Dalloz, Méthodes du droit, 2013. [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:03 am by Ron Coleman
In re Int’l Flavors & Fragrances Inc., 51 USPQ2d 1513, 1517-18 (Fed. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:58 am by Dan Harris
” Mike cerrará describiendo las “Mejores Prácticas para Proteger su Marca y Presencia en Línea. [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:00 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
Governor Cuomo announces judicial appointmeants to the Appellate Divisions of Supreme CourtSource: Office of the GovernorGovernor Andrew M. [read post]
22 May 2017, 5:31 am by Eugene Volokh
[L]ocal news covered his story and he presented his research at a national conference of the Institute of Transportation Engineers. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:10 am by Nico Cordes
After T 910/03 it languished but occasionally reappeared.The Board refrains from referring the matter to the EBoA as it considers such referral not to be decisive in the present case, since according to the Board a same conclusion would be reached using both the essentiality test and the gold standard (being that the removal violates Art. 76(1) EPC).Entscheidungsgründe(...)2. [read post]