Search for: "Windsor v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 5:19 am
Am I the only one who thinks all nine justices collectively wrote both opinions in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:09 pm
But DOMA essentially undoes the uniform definition that existed--one that relied on the state law definition (and expected states to give "Full Faith and Credit" to each others' determination when a person moved from one state to another). [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Cases that might be particularly well-suited to a historian's perspective include United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:50 pm
The ruling is in response to the June 26 decision in U.S v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
This will tear the fabric of our Communion at its deepest level ...From the Windsor Report of a year later:In terms of the wider Communion, and our wider relationships with a number of key ecumenical partners, the consecration [of V. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:52 pm
Supreme Court’s June 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:32 am
Windsor House, Inc., 57 Ohio St.3d 158 (1991) (Reaffirming the rationale discussed in Investors REIT One v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
In Windsor, the United States asked for the judgment to be affirmed, which should have scuttled the case. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
Fox v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:20 am
The case is Windsor v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:04 pm
Because the constitutionality of DOMA is already before the high court in two other petitions, the ACLU has asked the Supreme Court to bypass appeals court review in Windsor v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 12:07 pm
This much needed (and much anticipated) guidance is in response to the recent United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
Windsor striking down the Defense of Marriage Act, and the 2015 Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:44 am
First use of phrase "legalistic argle-bargle" since 1824's Gibbons v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:32 pm
Prior to the Windsor decision, federal law defined marriage for federal purposes as the union of one man and one woman, and allowed states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages granted under the laws of other states. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 7:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
