Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7781 - 7800
of 11,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2018, 5:07 pm
See City of Rolling Meadows v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 4:01 am
This project, initiated in 2004 and funded by Japan's Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), aims to make Japanese law more accessible to legal community around the globe by translating statutes and court decisions into English [Hooray, says the IPKat]. 11 research groups comprising 45 scholars are currently dealing with various areas of commercial law, including IP. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:03 pm
Before the Supreme Court's 6-3 judgment in Skinner v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 4:16 am
"I'm going to object because there's no question pending" translated into plain English means "Do not say anything more. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:13 pm
There is no reference to the Euro v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:58 pm
An early decision interpreting the VARA (English v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:47 pm
(And I think Karen Tani's work on Flemming v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:37 pm
The jurisdiction granted by the federal and state legislation only is constitutional under the "effects test" of Calder v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 1:03 am
The English case settled but in parallel litigation in the Netherlands concerning alendronate, the Dutch court did grant a declaration in favour of the generic, and in the terms sought. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:04 am
Following the IPKat's earlier post on the German Bundesgerichtshof decision on Lundbeck's escitalopram patent, the Kat's plea for an English translation of the German original has been kindly answered by German IP practice Hoffmann Eitle. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Having only recently reviewed the logo sponsorship deal in Force India v Etihad (see earlier post here), the IPKat finds himself perusing Hudson Bay Apparel Brands LLC v Umbro International Ltd [2009] EWHC B28 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Deputy Judge Mark Herbert QC, dating back to 4 November 2009.Umbro, an English company [owned by Nike] which enjoyed the fruits of an international licensing business based principally on football products,… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:48 am
It reiterated its previous finding in the case of Gregory v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1997, § 44, that the rule governing the secrecy of jury deliberations was a crucial and legitimate characteristic of English trial law which served to reinforce the jury’s role as the ultimate arbiter of fact and to guarantee open and frank deliberations among jurors. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 7:11 am
Reagan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
The CA agreed with the reasoning in a recent Hong Kong case which examined the English law on the question whether an employee may be a fiduciary and which concluded that this type of barring order could be made to protect the solicitor/client relationship but it was not appropriate to extend this type of order to the employer/employee relationship. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 3:29 am
Kay v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
Conners v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
" Miller v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 11:02 am
” He’s involved in Scientology v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 8:50 am
Additional Resources: Boren v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 8:00 am
S.522/A.1559: Requires a board of elections in a city of over one million to provide the same information in Russian that it provides in languages other than English. [read post]
