Search for: "S. W., an individual"
Results 7781 - 7800
of 11,737
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2011, 2:51 pm
"[W]e are convinced that the statutory scheme set out by our legislature is in the best interests of New York State and the best way to protect our citizens," Risa S. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
W. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
Baroness Hale made clear that “[w]hile we have been informed of its existence, we have not heard argument on whether or not that scheme is compatible with the Convention rights as the question does not arise on these appeals”. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 8:08 am
” “Judge Gibbons from the Ford trademark case, appointed to the appeals court by former President George W. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 2:02 am
Perhaps it’s a stipend allowing individuals to pursue continued learning opportunities. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am
For a parent to stand accused of such an offense is devastating both to that individual, and to the child’s lifelong relationship with the parent. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 11:55 am
Div. 2009)(noting a self employed individual is in a “better position to present an unrealistic picture of his or her actual income than a W-2 wage earner”). [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am
For a parent to stand accused of such an offense is devastating both to that individual, and to the child’s lifelong relationship with the parent. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:29 pm
[W]e accept the Board's interpretation of PTO regulations unless that interpretation is "plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
W. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
The United States Supreme Court affirmed, holding that attaching the GPS tracking device to an individual's vehicle, and thereby monitoring the vehicle's movements on public streets, constituted a search or seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:38 am
In Capizzi, this rule of law proved dispositive of Brown and Chiari’s argument, the appeals court holding: [W]e reject the contention of defendants that, based upon plaintiff’s past sworn statements, plaintiff is judicially estopped from taking the position that he is a partner in the firm [because] the elements of judicial estoppel are lacking. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 2:11 pm
W(x) = F {U1(x), U2(x), . . [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 1:18 pm
W(x) = F {U1(x), U2(x), . . [read post]
18 May 2020, 10:28 am
Tax Benefits of Qualified Disaster Relief Payments Section 139 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) excludes from a taxpayer’s gross income certain payments to individuals to reimburse or pay for expenses related to a “qualified disaster. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Specifically, you should head to the Records Division, which is located at 324 W Evans St, Florence, SC 29501. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:38 pm
W(x) = F {U1(x), U2(x), . . [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
Writing in concurrence, Judge Raymond W. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 10:21 am
Larry Cata Backer, professor of law and international affairs and W. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 10:03 pm
If closing arguments are completed today, that means federal Judge W. [read post]
