Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 7781 - 7800
of 29,478
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2022, 8:02 am
In Lucent v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:38 pm
Sentencing Guideline § 2D1.1(a)(2) applies a base “base offense level” of 38 in certain drug cases when “the offense of conviction establishes that death or serious bodily injury resulted from the use of the substance …” On March 16, 2016, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 9:24 am
This summer, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:35 am
See Rhodes v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 5:48 am
Samsung and that of Microsoft v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:08 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:30 am
The State Comptroller sustained the Hearing Officer’s determination** and Captain Bevilacqua appealed the Comptroller’s decision.The Appellate Division sustained the Comptroller’s determination, explaining that “[e]ven accepting [Captain Bevilacqua’s] testimony, the Hearing Officer concluded that [Captain Bevilacqua], who grew up in the area and described the porch as ‘one of those big old North Buffalo porches,’ should have reasonably anticipated… [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 2:43 pm
Montana, Meet Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
The court opined that "It is hornbook law that one who objects to the act of an administrative agency must exhaust available administrative remedies before being permitted to litigate [its objection] in a court of law," citing Watergate II Apts. v Buffalo Sewer Auth., 46 NY2d 52.* Addressing Facility's contention that it had raised a constitutional challenge alleging that OMIG exceeded its authority and violated Article III, §1, of the New York State… [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 2:06 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 12:48 pm
Clean Label Project Found. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:30 am
CLS Bank Int'l and its progeny), a patent can be invalidated or an application can be rejected simply by (i) making a high-level analogy between the claimed invention and one that has been previously found to be directed to a patent-ineligible law of nature, natural phenomena, or abstract idea, and (ii) stating in a purely conclusory fashion that the additional elements of the claim are well-understood, conventional, and routine. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 1:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:00 am
Guzman v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:36 am
Russo v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
The case of Smiths Group, PLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 8:28 pm
It should be noted that the debtors in this case had an income level that was twice the amount of the median income for their state. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:59 pm
” The case is Kransky v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 10:39 am
Abbott City of Berkeley v. 1080 Delaware, LLC (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 1144. [read post]
