Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 7801 - 7820
of 29,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2014, 1:28 pm
Quigg, 849 F.2d 1422, 1426-27 (Fed. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:52 am
By Rodney F. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:30 pm
FAS Techs., Inc., 138 F.3d 1448, 1451 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 4:42 am
AD-II Eng'ing, Inc., 326 F. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:13 pm
Kain, 589 F.3d 945, 949 (U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
Brown, 43 F.3d 618 (U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:32 am
Dodson, 960 F. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:09 pm
11 Dec 2018, 2:17 pm
7 Jun 2007, 4:27 am
Roselle Park Dist., 438 F.3d 713, (7th Cir. 2006). [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 4:24 pm
, __ F.3d __, 2007 WL 1859607, No. 06-56390 (9th Cir.).Thanks to the IP Law Observer for bringing this decision to my attention. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 3:03 am
Moore,193 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 1999), cert. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 1:16 pm
Given the particular facts of the case – the defendant threatened the victim with a firearm, the victim fled in his car, and the defendant gave chase in his van – the Court of Appeals might have concluded that a car chase does not constitute the sort of confinement, restraint, or removal that G.S. 14-39 (kidnapping) was intended to address. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
Borman, 960 F.2d at 331. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:17 am
Wang, in her January 14, 2009 affirmation in support of her motion to dismiss [exhibit F of MS # 2 OSC] states in ¶3: Pictures of Ming Chin Lin and Ms. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Apr. 28, 2023) 2 166 F.3d 509, 514 (2d Cir. 1999) 3 No. 1:21-cr-00229-RBJ, 2022 WL 1288585 (D. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am
Moreover, it was found to be obscene outright, and thus not legally distributable even to adults, not just obscene-as-to-minors, since the defendant was convicted of felony display of obscene material to minors, and not just misdemeanor display of obscene-as-to-minors material, and thus "the jury in this case was required to find that the movie involved was not only harmful to juveniles, but also was obscene. [read post]
Medical Device Cases Brightened by Recent U.S. Court of Appeals Decision; Stengel v. Medtronic, Inc.
12 Oct 2013, 9:00 am
Medtronic, Inc., 704 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2013). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:00 pm
Panalpina, Inc., 108 F.3d 529, 543 (4th Cir. 1997)). [read post]
