Search for: "DOES 1-12"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 28,898
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2009, 5:56 am
Revised Item 401(e)(1), Reg. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am
In these cases, the review does not proceed to section 1 where the government has the onus to show the infringement is justified. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:44 pm
Marrison and John McIntyre, for the Defendants ) ) ) HEARD: April 12, 2017 THE HONOURABLE MR. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
Arkema Inc., Slip op. at 11-12, 2012 WL ___ (5th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:03 am
That said, the Board showed in the recent K-12 decisionthat it is prepared to adopt its own methodology, subject of course to procedural fairness concerns. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
Though lawyers might theoretically do some things differently when facing a unanimity requirement, there is no systematic way in which attorneys would have conducted a trial if only they had known in advance that they needed 12/12 and not 11/12 or 10/12 votes for a conviction.There are, of course, other reasons for limiting retroactivity of new rulings to direct appeal. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
The term monocytes does not embrace dendritic cells. [read post]
16 May 2011, 2:37 am
California adopted the first-in-the-country breach notification law nearly a decade ago in 2002 (1 PVLR 1180, 10/7/02), and in April 2010, Mississippi became the latest state to enact such a law (9 PVLR 533, 4/12/10). [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 4:09 pm
And how does it differ from federal WARN? [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:37 am
FOOTNOTES [1] Please see here for previously published article on the Original Ordinance. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 1:47 pm
The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that by its plain and unambiguous language, section 212.093(1) does not prohibit county jail inmates from possessing cell phones. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 7:11 pm
The decision of Digital Rights Ireland Ltd C‑293/12 & Kärntner Landesregierung C‑594/12 will be of course still subject to many diverging interpretations. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
The appealed order, purporting to clarify the parties' rights under the arbitration agreement, does not fall within any of the types of appealable orders identified under either the state or federal statutes. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:29 pm
But it does strengthen neural pathways and lead to associations and predictions. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:32 pm
§ 213(b)(12). [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
The appealed order, purporting to clarify the parties' rights under the arbitration agreement, does not fall within any of the types of appealable orders identified under either the state or federal statutes. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:25 am
” J.A. 12. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
<> DOE Needs to Improve Cost Estimates for Transuranic Waste Projects at Los Alamos - GAO-15-182, Nuclear Waste, February 18, 2015. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:37 pm
’467 patent, col. 3, line 58, through col. 4, line 12.Id. at *9-10. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 12:25 pm
Parke issued her decision June 23, 2006. *** Rome Electrical Systems, Inc. (10-CA-35458; 349 NLRB No. 72) Rome, GA April 12, 2007. [read post]
