Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 7841 - 7860 of 12,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 9:29 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"Our side" considered it a loss (I was lobbying for the Innocence Project of Texas on the subject), but the law simply did not give criminal defendants the means to keep eyewitness testimony out of evidence if lineups don't follow written policies, nor if written policies are inadequate.Ironically, though Chief Rodriguez wants to blame the Legislature for his woes, the much more significant penalty for failing to follow best practices was laid down in October by the… [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
Here is what I say about this precise topic in Chapter 4 of my new book, in my discussion of the landmark Warren Court opinion of New York Times v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 12:33 pm by Josh Blackman
I sat through dozens of sentencing proceedings and several criminal jury trials. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
The physician acts as an "informed intermediary" between the manufacturer and the patient; and, thus, the manufacturer's duty to caution against a drug's side effects is fulfilled by giving adequate warning through the prescribing physician, not directly to the patient.Martin v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
I am personally often reluctant to talk to the press, however, and, when I do, the most ridiculous, out-of-context information comes through. [read post]