Search for: "State v. Plan" Results 7841 - 7860 of 29,606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2021, 6:45 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
Hindsight arguments concerning selection of one of several reasonable courses of action do not state a viable cause of action for malpractice (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [2017]). [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 9:56 am by Giles Peaker
This was a judicial review of LB Enfield’s plans for borough wide additional HMO licensing and selective licensing of all PRS properties. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 7:00 am by Aziza Ahmed
The most relevant precedent is Whole Woman’s Health’s restatement of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:25 pm
PGM will also serve three years of probation under the terms of an environmental compliance plan which will be audited by a court-appointed monitor. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:44 pm
Please take a look and, if you like, plan to join us. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
And the failures of the United States to protect its own story in its own way may well be quite costly--not in Russia, bit within those states in which the bacillus of Russian counter-storytelling can have debilitating effect on the American effort to promote a rules based international order in its own image. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Lawyers with contingency-fee role in AGs’ carbon campaign join Hagens Berman [Scott Flaherty, American Lawyer; earlier on climate lawyers on contingency fee here and here] Encyclopedia of Libertarianism, 2008, includes entries on urban planning by Mark Pennington and on eminent domain and takings by Karol Boudreaux; California legislature’s $1.5 billion green Christmas tree includes bill “aimed at helping a union looking to organize workers who assemble Tesla electric… [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Eric Claeys (George Mason/Scalia) on Penn Central v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
[For a more interesting case on gifts see More on Phillips v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 9:43 am by Amanda Pickens
July 18, 2017) (purported collective and class action brought under federal and state wage and hour laws by employees who were assigned to work under the “9/80” pay plan but were allegedly denied overtime compensation and other lawful pay due under that plan.) [read post]