Search for: "Key v State"
Results 7861 - 7880
of 22,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 pm
Texas); and rejected (unanimously) the continued vitality of much-cited dicta from the Court’s 1934’s United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:35 am
(AP Photo/Susan Walsh) Earlier this morning, the Supreme Court chose to hear Fisher v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:02 pm
" Mills v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 10:19 am
And now, following the Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:40 am
In Lewis v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:40 am
In Lewis v. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 9:17 am
Pingue v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
See Smith v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:42 am
This cabining of Mayo will be the key to any petition for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:51 am
In the 1990s, the Church of Scientology’s generated a string of cases in the United States, colloquially known as “Scientology versus the Internet” (referring to: Religious Technology Center v Netcom (1995); Religious Technology Center v F.A.C.T.Net Inc (1995); Religious Technonlogy Center v Lerma (1995)).To understand the significance of these cases, we must go back to an earlier dispute between the Church of Scientology and a former member --… [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
Competition and innovation are key ideals in American society, and they were the main focus on March 5, 2014 when the CEOs of SpaceX and United Launch Alliance (“ULA”) testified before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense.[1] The ULA, a joint venture between aerospace giants Boeing and Lockheed Martin, currently provides launch services for the U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:22 am
The IPKat is delighted to host the analysis below by Thomas Key, a JD student at Chicago-Kent Law School, on the recent decision of the US Supreme Court in Iancu v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 7:17 am
As the plaintiffs in BHA v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
That’s the question confronting the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, in Pappas v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 6:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:32 pm
The point is we can win in PURPLE states. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am
” The challengers seemingly agree with the state that a key question in the dispute now before the Supreme Court is whether there is an identifiable and manageable test for partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 8:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Estate of Mark Parsons, et al. v. [read post]
