Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 7881 - 7900 of 16,708
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2015, 11:28 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
" The Tenth Circuit had a rather convoluted theory that a cross-appeal is only for instances where an appellee wants "more than it obtained by the lower-court judgment" and since the appellee was not seeking alteration of the judgment, they need not file a cross-appeal.In United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:31 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The “public concern” test from employment cases is a poor fit for the reasons stated by the dissent. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
US states are considering tightening regulations. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 5:08 am by SHG
So it comes as no shock that the New Jersey Supreme Court held that section 3 of the Bias Intimidation law, N.J.S.A. 2C:16-1, was rejected as unconstitutional in State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
This, said the court, “provided adequate notice” explaining that as stated by the arbitrator, the fact that Petitioner "may not have received notice prior to [receiving a letter of concern] was based on her own [earlier] misstatements as to her publications.... [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am by DOUGLAS MCGREGOR, BRODIES LLP
It was in that case that Lord Reid stated that it was quite possible for a motorist to be very much more to blame than a pedestrian due to the fact that a pedestrian while crossing a road has to look left and right as well as forwards while a driver does not. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:01 am by Ben
” There’s no digital single market when travellers can't use the services they pay for once they cross a border, linguistic minorities are denied access to cultural works in their native language, innovative services are only available in the big member states because of varying regional hurdles – or UK MEPs are blocked from following the cricket in Brussels. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 1:31 am by INFORRM
See previous trial reports Collins opened his submissions by stating that while Fairfax was not seeking an adverse finding of credit against Hockey, his evidence was clearly “unsatisfactory”. [read post]