Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 7881 - 7900 of 41,777
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
8 May 2020, 10:00 am by Don Cruse
D/B/A TMZ; TMZ.COM; AND ELIZABETH MCKERNAN v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday’s second argument was in Barr v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
[So a Maryland appellate court held last month, I think quite correctly (and consistently with the broad trend in other states):] From Nouri v. [read post]