Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 7961 - 7980
of 13,860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2014, 3:23 pm
The important bit to note is that these were cases which were dealt with on the basis of a potential breach of article 8 ECHR NOT article 6 ECHR (because article 6 does not apply to immigration cases). [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 3:16 pm
Utah Code 30-1-2(5) included among the marriages that were “prohibited and declared void,” those “between persons of the same sex. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
., Fort Collins, on Sunday, June 29, from noon to 5 p.m., and on Monday, June 30, from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
The consultation concludes on 1 July 2014. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:14 am
Moreover, 29 C.F.R. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 13-1280Issue: (1) Whether the Court of Appeals erred in upholding the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s post hoc rationalization in litigation that, under 29 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:25 am
., p. 29)Schmitt also reminded us nearly a century ago that the significant concepts of the theory of the state are theological in nature that have been de-natured, but whose patterns and premises remain essential to the understanding of the way in which these conceptions are realized. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
Under the proposed rule, the regulatory definition of spouse in 29 CFR §§ 825.102 and 825.122(b) would be amended to look to the law of the place in which the marriage was entered into, as opposed to the law of the state in which the employee resides. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
A few general conclusions can be advanced about this mode of reasoning: 1. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:04 am
Under OSHA regulation 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1), every employer that operates forklifts must provide its employees with proper training. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 6:34 am
If it were, then why are six circuit courts (well now seven) split on the issue and what does this mean? [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 3:38 pm
The Executor was granted Preliminary Letters Testamentary on October 29, 2009. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:35 am
“On April 29, 2013, Mr. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:18 am
Nor does every defendant and every case justify the kind of research we do. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 pm
” 29 C.F.R. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
Thus, to be registrable, the claimed designation must (1) be a trademark; and (2) not run afoul of any of the limitations in subsections (a)-(f). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 12:45 pm
Magee, 2010 BCSC 491 at paras. 20-29; Bodeux v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:34 am
(2) Does the presence of technological protection measures affect the level of the levies? [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
There are two linchpins of the MDA’s express preemption provision – a state cannot maintain a requirement that is (1) “different from or in addition to” any requirement applicable to the device which (2) “relates to the safety and effectiveness of the device. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
(2001) 26 Cal. 4th 1 and ending with Cassel v. [read post]
