Search for: "U.S. Direct Express" Results 7961 - 7980 of 9,644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2011, 4:34 am by Dave Rein
Slater had directed the monkeys, but it doesn’t sound like he did so here. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:34 am by Dave Rein
Slater had directed the monkeys, but it doesn’t sound like he did so here. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 7:35 am by Lawrence Solum
  One formulation expresses opposition to deductive systems--to be antitheoretical is to be oppose a method that begins with axioms and then proceeds to deduce the theorems and corollaries that guide normative practice. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
The four-page, unsigned opinion for the majority was skeptical throughout in its reaction to legal, diplomatic and legislature arguments that Obama Administration lawyers had laid before the Court, as direct representatives of the President. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:57 pm by Aaron Barkoff
Rule 54(b) permits a district court “to direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:32 am by Davis Wright Tremaine
” Second, the Directive permits the user to express consent through browser settings, opening the possibility that consent requirements could be satisfied by a user’s declared preference to accept cookies through browser settings. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:05 pm by Michael O'Hear
I think, though, that it would be hard to use the British data to justify broken windows policing here (even assuming the data would be the same in the U.S.). [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:57 am by Lawrence Solum
United States, 521 U.S. 898, 117 S.Ct. 2365, 138 L.Ed.2d 914 (1997), and New York v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 10:32 am by Schachtman
Siracusano, __ U.S. __, 131 S.Ct., 1309 (2011), to advance views, not supported by the law or the science. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:02 pm by Lovechilde
  Oddly, it lingers most strongly in the Obama White House, of all places, where a keenness to express American ideals by dropping bombs seems strangely undiminished. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:04 am by Susan Brenner
Innis, 446 U.S. 291 (1980), Miranda interrogation encompasses both (i) express questioning and (ii) “any words or actions on the part of the police (other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody) that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:25 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Of course, the authority for both conclusions is slender–a plurality opinion in one case.Let me direct your attention to some other helpful sources. [read post]