Search for: "A. MILLER, Classification" Results 61 - 80 of 232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2019, 12:26 pm by Clay
2019 SENATE BILL 129March 20, 2019 - Introduced by Senators Roth, Risser, Bewley, Kooyenga, Larson, Miller, Olsen, Ringhand and Smith, cosponsored by Representatives Rohrkaste, Goyke, Anderson, Billings, Bowen, Crowley, Duchow, Hutton, Jagler, Myers, Pope, Ramthun, Sinicki, Spreitzer, Steffen, Subeck, Swearingen, C. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am by MBettman
The Appeal On appeal, the First District, in an opinion  authored by Judge Charles Miller and joined by Judge Dennis Deters, in which Judge Beth Myers concurred in judgment only, reversed the decision of the trial court. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
This legislative proposal is similar to, but even more ambitious (insofar as it includes consideration of race as well as gender) than, a California law passed earlier this year that mandated the inclusion of women on corporate boards, and about which we wrote a three-part series of Verdict columns.As we pointed out in Part One of that series, while there is perhaps some “uncertainty over how quotas will fare under [the] intermediate scrutiny” that is applicable to gender-based… [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am by MBettman
Once a classification has been made the owner must have the right to challenge the determination in accordance with due process.) [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Query whether that sort of content classification is constitutional given R.A.V. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Query whether that sort of content classification is constitutional given R.A.V. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 1:15 pm by Ilya Somin
As Miller points out, size and strength are less significant in many positions in modern armies than in earlier eras. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Bakke, on a point echoed by four other justices—“Title VI [which prohibits race discrimination in educational institutions receiving federal funding] must be held to proscribe only those racial classifications that would violate the [Fourteenth Amendment’s] Equal Protection Clause. . . . [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:15 pm by Lev Sugarman
Jordan and Aaron David Miller. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 8:18 am by Eugene Volokh
" Id. at 7-8 (emphasis omitted) (first quoting Miller, 394 N.W.2d at 779). [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 5:06 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, such a classification is "a powerful expression of [the state legislature's] belief that the offense is not serious enough to be disqualifying. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am by Schachtman
This classification is controversial, but the association between silica exposure and lung cancer in humans appears to be on much firmer ground in those with silicosis than in those without (5, 25). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:06 am by MBettman
In Judge Miller’s view, “once a juvenile court makes an appropriate classification under R.C. 2152.83, it is permanently vested with jurisdiction to review the classification in accordance with R.C. 2152.84 and 2152.85. [read post]