Search for: "BP, LLC"
Results 61 - 80
of 240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2018, 12:21 pm
Kaplan’s customer, identified in the AWC by the initials ‘BP’, as “[a] 93-year-old retired clothing salesman” who opened several accounts at Vanderbilt with Mr. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:18 pm
Red Deer Resources LLC is a case involving a marginal well operated by BP that was producing at very low levels. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:18 am
On September 22, the Texas Supreme Court refused to reconsider its opinion in BP America v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 1:22 pm
Cir. 2013)); see also BP Lubricants,637 F.3d at 1313. [read post]
30 May 2017, 7:34 am
Red Deer Resources, LLC, No. 15-0569, a unanimous opinion written by Justice Green. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:39 am
BP Prods. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:26 pm
David Topol Margaret Thomas In its June 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:34 am
Realty, LLC, 22 NY3d 762 (2014); Sean Reeps. v BMW of North Am., LLC, 26 N.Y.3d 801 (2016). [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself: see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9] A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm
On February 14, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts reviewed the application of the state’s “anti-SLAPP” law to challenges made against a blogged critique of Cardno Chemrisk, LLC (Chemrisk) and British Oetroleum (BP) in the case of Cardno Chemrisk, LLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:22 am
The post criticized BP and one of its experts, ChemRisk, for scientific data and opinions ChemRisk presented in the multi-district federal lawsuit against BP stemming from the 2010 oil spill disaster, particularly ChemRisk's opinions that the spill was far smaller than alleged (1.7 million barrels smaller) and that exposure to cleanup workers was below permissible limits set by OSHA.ChemRisk sued the authors of the blog post for defamation in state court in Massachusetts, and… [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:22 am
The post criticized BP and one of its experts, ChemRisk, for scientific data and opinions ChemRisk presented in the multi-district federal lawsuit against BP stemming from the 2010 oil spill disaster, particularly ChemRisk's opinions that the spill was far smaller than alleged (1.7 million barrels smaller) and that exposure to cleanup workers was below permissible limits set by OSHA.ChemRisk sued the authors of the blog post for defamation in state court in… [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:22 am
The post criticized BP and one of its experts, ChemRisk, for scientific data and opinions ChemRisk presented in the multi-district federal lawsuit against BP stemming from the 2010 oil spill disaster, particularly ChemRisk's opinions that the spill was far smaller than alleged (1.7 million barrels smaller) and that exposure to cleanup workers was below permissible limits set by OSHA.ChemRisk sued the authors of the blog post for defamation in state court in Massachusetts, and… [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 11:05 am
Oberle Communications LLC[1] puts out a “Product Safety Letter,” with almost daily emails that link to published articles of interest to lawyers and others who are concerned with product safety. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:12 pm
According to BP Energy, the Court remanded the case to FERC for further explanation of why the 2012 agreement which permitted Statoil Natural Gas, LLC, to turn back certain capacity held on DCP’s system was not unduly discriminatory under Natural Gas Act (NGA) Section § 3(e)(4) as to BP Energy, which was not offered comparable capacity turn back rights. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:12 pm
According to BP Energy, the Court remanded the case to FERC for further explanation of why the 2012 agreement which permitted Statoil Natural Gas, LLC, to turn back certain capacity held on DCP’s system was not unduly discriminatory under Natural Gas Act (NGA) Section § 3(e)(4) as to BP Energy, which was not offered comparable capacity turn back rights. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 8:18 am
Red Deer Resources, LLC In BP America Production Company v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 8:18 am
Red Deer Resources, LLC In BP America Production Company v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 8:18 am
Red Deer Resources, LLC In BP America Production Company v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
BP Alaska LNG LLC, ConocoPhillips Alaska LNG Company, and ExxonMobil Alaska LNG LLC, are the other sponsors of the project. [read post]
