Search for: "Beverages, Inc., in Re" Results 61 - 80 of 385
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
San Francisco Nov. 16, 2020), and In re Dropbox, Inc. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 3:42 am
Chien, 120 USPQ2d 1710, 1716 (TTAB 2016); In re Eagle Crest Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 (TTAB 2010); In re Volvo Cars of N. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 7:21 am by Kristian Soltes
Global stablecoins (or GSCs) could also increase the demand for reserve fiat currencies they’re backed by, according to the paper. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:50 am
"] In re Globus Medical, Inc., Serial No. 88676830 (December 8, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christen M. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
In Germany the re-ratification process of the Unified Patent Court Agreement is progressing rapidly, but the threat of new constitutional complaints is looming. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
In Germany the re-ratification process of the Unified Patent Court Agreement is progressing rapidly, but the threat of new constitutional complaints is looming. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
If you think I get unduly excited when I find an excuse to blog about celebs – well, you’re probably right. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:24 am
” In re Chippendales USA, Inc., 90 USPQ2d 1535, 1539-40 (TTAB 2009), aff’d, 96 USPQ2d 1681 The Board applied the ever-popular test of Seabrook Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 2:35 am
[Answers in first comment].In re Simoniz USA, Inc, Serial No. 87865135 (November 3, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin). [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
The offer, usually expressed at least partly in natural language on the face of the vending machine, is a “general invitation to the public to buy [a] beverage,” assuming we’re talking about a soda machine. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 4:37 am
Opposer also provided evidence that it is not uncommon for restaurants to offer private label wines.Relying on In re Opus One, Inc., 60 USPQ2d 1812, 1813 (TTAB 2001), the Board found that opposer satisfied the "something more" requirement, and so the second DuPont factor favored opposer.Channels of Trade: The evidence showed that the ordinary distributions channels for wine include restaurants, that applicant sells wine at its restaurant, and that opposer's wines… [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:40 pm by Jennifer Barna
EO 157 also provides the following respecting miscellaneous indoor and outdoor businesses: Any establishment open to the public, including a food or beverage establishment, must cordon off any indoor or outdoor dance floors to the public; Amusement and water parks are permitted to open their outdoor premises to the public only where they are in compliance with the health and safety standards issued by the Commissioner of DOH; Pool facilities are permitted to open to the public only where… [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 2:47 am
This cancellation arose out of Retrobrands’ efforts to clear the path for its use of the mark and issuance of its own application.Respondent, along with Mondelēz North America, Mondelēz Exports, Mondelēz International, Inc., is part of the family of companies under Mondelēz International, Inc., a multinational confectionery, food and beverage company. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Despite the confusing verbiage, these judicial rulings are a serious deviation from the text of Rule 702, as well as the Advisory Committee Note to the 2000 Amendments, which embraced the standard articulated in In re Paoli, that “any step that renders the analysis unreliable . . . renders the expert’s testimony inadmissible. [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:39 am
In re Nett Designs, Inc., 236 F.3d 1339, 57 USPQ2d 1564, 1566 (Fed. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm by HSnader
Pepper Hilton Hotels Black & Decker Dunlop Tires IBM Braum’s Inc. [read post]