Search for: "Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp."
Results 61 - 80
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2011, 12:26 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. (9th Circuit, February 14, 2011), reviewed elsewhere in this blog. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:51 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 635 F.3d 383 (9th Cir. 2011) and the unavailability of the FLSA's administrative exemption, pharmaceutical companies will remain somewhat in limbo as to whether they may appropriately treat such employees as exempt. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:55 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., this decision is particularly disturbing. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 8:27 am
Citing the US Supreme Court case of Christopher v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:59 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., for example, rejected the argument that pharmaceutical sales representatives did not qualify for the Outside Sales exemption. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:49 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. dba GlaxoSmithKline, Case No. 11-204 (June 18, 2012). [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 6:33 am
Thus, such employees are not entitled to overtime protection.In Christopher v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
Cir. 2006) (en banc in part) SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 952 F. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., which held that pharmaceutical reps are subject to the "outside sales" exemption to the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:59 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., for example, rejected the argument that pharmaceutical sales representatives did not qualify for the Outside Sales exemption. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:15 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 5:03 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 US 142, 155 (2012) which was further quoting Bowen v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:41 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:50 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:36 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
” And in a second case, Christopher v. [read post]