Search for: "Consolidated Edison Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2010, 12:30 pm by Alain Leibman
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, 580 F.2d 1122, 1131 n.18 (2nd Cir. 1978) (Rule covers contractor records provided to Atomic Energy Commission); United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:38 pm
This may apply to punishment of corporations and other entities, and not just of individuals, at least according to Consolidated Edison Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 2:52 pm by John Hempill and Karl Buhler
This is an issue that actually dates back to the seminal 2005 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit in Consolidated Edison, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:26 am
To sell or exercise stock subscription or conversion rights, participate in foreclosures, reorganizations, consolidations, mergers or liquidations, and to consent to corporate sales or leases and encumbrances, and, in the exercise of those powers, the fiduciary is authorized to deposit stocks, bonds or other securities with any custodian, agent, protective or other similar committee, or trustee under a voting trust agreement, under terms and conditions respecting the deposit thereof as the… [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:54 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Instead, it “reweigh[s] th[e] evidence,” In re WarsawOrthopedic, Inc., 832 F.3d 1327, 1333 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:49 am
Corp., 215 AD2d 191, 196 [1995] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see also Consolidated Edison Co. of NY, Inc. v United Coastal Ins. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 4:14 am
Consolidated Edison Corp., 488 F.3d 586, 593 (2d Cir. 2007), id., at *3-*5, “which read Steiner as being limited to ‘workplace dangers that transcend ordinary risks,’” id., at *4. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 5:48 pm
In Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co. (78 NY2d 509 [1991]), we clarified that "extent of the elevation differential" (here, measured by the depth of the trench) is not necessarily dispositive (id. at 514) and on this basis I conclude that based on plaintiff's deposition testimony as to the depth of the trench (which we must take as true for purposes of deciding defendants' motions for summary judgment), there was a significant elevation differential in this… [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On or about January 28, 2016, plaintiff commenced a personal injury action in this Court styled Hazel Carasco v City of New York, Consolidated Edison Company, and Halcyon Construction Company, et. al., under Ind. [read post]