Search for: "Davidson v. State Bar" Results 61 - 80 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
App. 1994), emotional distress was determined unrecoverable under a statute that the Golden Staters call “Song-Beverly”.ColoradoThe Colorado Supreme Court, while noting that other states bar personal injury claims under consumer protection statutes, has yet to decide the question. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 7:01 am by Marc Poirier
  Judge Davidson’s express precedent is Canady v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 10:33 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Hawk, 855 S.W.2d 573 (Tenn. 1993) and the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Troxel v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 4:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This wasn’t an isolated case either, as Justice Dunphy pointed to another case in Davidson v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 5:30 am by Kevin
But Palmer’s expert tried to extend this to the whole chorus: 250    Dr Davidson expressed the opinion that the melodic contours of the second phrase (bars 3–4: “No, we ain’t gonna take it” / “Joyful and triumphant”) and third phrase (bars 5–6: “We’re not gonna take it, anymore” / “O come ye, o come ye to Bethlehem”) were very similar. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Family Lawyer said that on July 1, 2005, after spending several hours in a bar in Manhattan, at which he consumed at least six beers, the defendant attended a friend's party in Merrick in Nassau County. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
  Last week, in State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am by Dennis Crouch
  The specification expressly states that “an effective dose … can be from … about 480 mg to about 720 mg per day. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm by Ilya Somin
Metropolitan Govt. of Nashville & Davidson Cty., 67 F. 4th 816, 829 (CA6 2023). [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County, No. 07-5180 In a case brought by a police officer alleging that, after an altercation at a bar while he was off duty, he was unlawfully required to take the breathalyzer test in violation of his constitutional rights, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) under a totality-of-the-circumstances analysis, plaintiff was not seized when he submitted to the breathalyzer test, but was only afraid he would be terminated or… [read post]