Search for: "Davis v. Action Mechanical" Results 61 - 80 of 202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2019, 7:22 am by Mark Tabakman
”  The case is entitled Chambers v Precision Pipeline Solutions and was filed in federal court in the District of New Jersey. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Tries to address 1A issues including US v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
And there are no accountability mechanisms to determine whether campaigns actually follow through with their promises. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:04 am by Dan Bressler
” After various facts played out and an unhappy client sued, said the Court: “‘An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
My focus was on scientific experts, and how inquisitorial mechanics for the processing of lab experts’ findings were introduced in British India. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 3:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428). [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by SHG
There is some merit to Dorf’s contention, in that Title IX prohibition against sex discrimination in education never provided cover for any of this beyond the authority provided by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Libel actions – here or the United States? [read post]