Search for: "Does 2 through 89" Results 61 - 80 of 954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2013, 7:30 am by Dennis Crouch
Monsanto Company (Supreme Court 2013) In a short opinion a unanimous Supreme Court has sided with Monsanto in holding that the doctrine of patent exhaustion “does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder’s permission. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 11:41 am
Fuel savings (89%), environmental impact (67%) and government incentives (58%) were top factors. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Can a loss of priority lead to a violation of A 123(2)? [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:07 am by S
The authorities showed that costs become incurred when they are either expended or become payable (see Brent LBC  v Shulem B Association Ltd [2011] EWHC 1663 (Ch) / Capital & Counties Freehold Equity Trust Ltd v BL plc [1987] 2 EGLR 49 / Hyams v Wilfred East Housing Co-Operative [2007] 1 E.G.L.R. 89); they did not become incurred merely because a liability to pay at a future date had arisen. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:07 am by S
The authorities showed that costs become incurred when they are either expended or become payable (see Brent LBC  v Shulem B Association Ltd [2011] EWHC 1663 (Ch) / Capital & Counties Freehold Equity Trust Ltd v BL plc [1987] 2 EGLR 49 / Hyams v Wilfred East Housing Co-Operative [2007] 1 E.G.L.R. 89); they did not become incurred merely because a liability to pay at a future date had arisen. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:31 am
Land use is generally controlled and regulated through public controls (e.g., zoning laws) and private controls via deed restrictions. [read post]
15 Sep 2006, 12:56 am
Council Directive 89/104 ... since it does not constitute a sign capable of being represented graphically and capable of distinguishing goods and services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings.(2) In any event, Article 3(1)(e), second indent, of ... [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:46 am
The matter then came before Rolf Driver FM in the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia: Perez & Ors v Fernandez [2012] FMCA 2 (10 February 2012). [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Given this exceptional nature of the intervention, it does not appear likely that there would have been a legislative intent to create an elaborate and intricate system of procedural provisions for the admissibility of interventions, and therefore the Board should also refrain from creating such a system through its jurisprudence. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 5:49 pm by David
The recognition of this right does not abrogate any private or public property rights, nor does it limit the state’s power to regulate commercial activity. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
This Kat is however concerned about the leisurely pace at which this litigation, initiated in 2008, has meandered through the courts. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm by Patricia Hughes
Phase 2 (“MedReleaf”), the Ontario Agricultural, Food and Rural Affairs Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) concluded that the caselaw since then does not warrant a different outcome. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:00 pm
WAPF does not make this distinction when promoting the safety of raw milk. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”The Commissioner then opined that although did not carry her “burden of proof sufficient to warrant relief in this appeal, the record does present issues worthy of review by my Office of Special Education. [read post]