Search for: "Dye v. Dye"
Results 61 - 80
of 205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2010, 8:24 pm
In the second case, Price v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 9:21 am
The textile allows the casing to transmit dyes and aromas to the encased food. [read post]
15 May 2015, 5:39 am
Recent PatLit pieces review Unwired Planet v Huawei (FRAND and competition law issues held unsuitable for summary judgment) and the award of this year's Prix de thèse Véron & Associés. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 2:51 am
GRESPA had made a proper demand for recognition and bargaining.The Circuit denied Deans’s petition for review and granted in full NLRB’s applications for enforcement of its order.The court noted that a “new employer has an obligation to bargain with” the union representing its predecessor’s employees if “the new employer is in fact a successor of the old employer and the majority of its employees were employed by its predecessor,” citing Fall River… [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
Fait v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:26 am
It reminds me of other hippie-dippy icons that have been the basis of IP legal battles, such as the "Keep on Truckin'" logo, color designs for tie-dye shirts (Banzai v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 4:49 am
The IPKat thinks that these proceedings sound similar to that in the old English decision of Maxims Ltd v Dye [1977] 1 WLR 1155 (Ch). [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
GRESPA had made a proper demand for recognition and bargaining.The Circuit denied Deans's petition for review and granted in full NLRB's applications for enforcement of its order.The court noted that a "new employer has an obligation to bargain with" the union representing its predecessor's employees if "the new employer is in fact a successor of the old employer and the majority of its employees were employed by its predecessor," citing Fall River Dyeing… [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:52 am
David Silman, an injury lawyer with the Fraser Valley’s Waterstone Law Group, took issue with the recently upheld decision of Hussack v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 11:16 am
Wyers v. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 9:59 am
Hagy v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 5:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
Indeed, there were a few clues as I read the court’s opinion in Dye v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:28 am
SCOTUSblog’s online symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:53 pm
” Ellingham v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:53 pm
” Ellingham v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:53 pm
Ellingham v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:51 am
I'll keep you posted on the lawyer v. law school arguments in the coming weeks. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:05 pm
” [Ann Althouse] Citing First Amendment, federal court enjoins FDA from prohibiting truthful speech by drugmakers about off-label uses [WSJ, Alex Tabarrok (in recent years, federal government “has extracted billions of dollars in settlements from pharmaceutical firms for engaging in what appears to be constitutionally protected speech”), Beck and Sullivan, Drug & Device Law on Amarin v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:30 pm
" (Polymer Tech Corp v Mimran (1992)). [read post]
