Search for: "Elizabeth B. v Scott B." Results 61 - 80 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 11:26 am by Scott Bomboy
  The Supreme Court accepted the cases on Sept. 29, 2023, and it limited arguments to two questions presented by Elizabeth B. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
The Second Restatement conditions negligence per se liability on violation of an enactment that met four "purposes":(a) to protect a class of persons which includes the onewhose interest is invaded, and(b) to protect the particular interest which is invaded, and(c) to protect that interest against the kind of harm which has resulted, and(d) to protect that interest against the particular hazardfrom which the harm results.Restatement (Second) of Torts §286 (1965) (emphasis… [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am by Schachtman
Program six was a round-table discussion among the directors (past, present, and future) of the FJC, all of whom were sitting federal judges, with two lawyers in private practice, Elizabeth Cabraser and me.1 One of the more exasperating moments in our conversation came when Ms. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(UCLA)Camp Mary Elizabeth (Indiana University)Carmel Jonathan (University of Michigan)Carroll Christopher (Johns Hopkins University)Cassar Gavin (University of Pennsylvania)Chaney Thomas (University of Chicago)Chari Varadarajan V. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
One such Dred Scott case was the result of a bench trial in a federal district court in Atlanta, in Wells v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:09 am by Jeralyn
Because the FEC and the tape itself identify the speaker as Commissioner McGahn, his statements also are authenticated under Rule 901(b)(5) and 901(b)(7). [read post]