Search for: "Finnegan v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
  Nicholas also set out the position in respect of injunctive relief following the Huawei v ZTE framework. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
(IP:JUR) A single EU patent looks dead in the water as member states seek alternatives (IAM) Neither democracy nor constitution: is it time to reign in EPO rule-making? [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Perth man Patrick Finnegan said he was unfairly made out to be a fraudster and an opportunist on the message board Slack for about 300 electric vehicle industry figures and EV motoring enthusiasts. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:45 am
Griffith Price of Finnegan Henderson spoke next and he used Judge Robert Payne of the Eastern District Court of Virginia's seminal ruling last year in the DuPont v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law)   United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:44 am by Yvonne Daly
Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 centred on the constitutionality of s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, as amended by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:29 pm by Lawrence Higgins
Guest speakers & presenters include, Tom Irving of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Prof. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm by Lawrence Higgins
Guest speakers & presenters include, Tom Irving of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Prof. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm by Lawrence Higgins
But even if it's just treated as symbolic expression, it is still constitutionally protected, as cases such as Texas v. [read post]