Search for: "Ford v. District of Columbia"
Results 61 - 80
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
P. 166a(i); Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm
In the case of Maras v Lesses ([2016] SADC 40) the District Court of South Australia awarded damages of Aus$75,000 to a member of the Greek Orthodox Community of South Australia against another member of the community in respect of a defamatory flyer, newsletter and email. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Thereafter, he studied and taught at Columbia University Law School while earning an LL.M. degree. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:36 pm
In this particular case, the F.B.I. and the District of Columbia Police Department attached a hidden G.P.S. device to a vehicle belonging to Antoine Jones, a suspected drug dealer. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to rule on Trump’s appeal. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Postal Service notified 46 states and the District of Columbia that their mail-in voting deadlines were incompatible with the Postal Service’s standards for mail processing times. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:46 am
” Whether a former president should ever have the unilateral power to assert executive privilege over the objection of the incumbent remains an unsettled issue, as the Supreme Court recently recognized in Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (Patent Docs),US: Alnylam CEO forecasts ‘perfect storm’ for biomedical patents: (Patent Docs),US: Human Genome launches patent suit against Genentech over type of protein used to detect tumours: (IP Law360)Pharma & Biotech - ProductsCaduet (Atorvastatin/Amlodipine) – US: Pfizer sues Ranbaxy to block generic Caduet until 2016: (IP Law360),Dovonex (Calcipotriol) – Chancery Division EWHC grants interim injunction prohibiting Sandoz from distributing… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Ford, in 1975, Stevens is the fourth-longest-serving Justice in the Court’s history; the record holder is the man Stevens replaced, William O. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Ford, in 1975, Stevens is the fourth-longest-serving Justice in the Court’s history; the record holder is the man Stevens replaced, William O. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 12:42 pm
In Minnesota’s second Congressional District Angie Craig is running for a second time against incumbent Jason Lewis who narrowly won in 2016 and has a long history of making misogynistic statements in a district where suburban women could determine the outcome of this election. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm
Rahman Ford writes on stem cell therapy policy Two years ago, the U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
” But legal scholars have concluded that impeachment is considerably more law-governed, and constrained, than Ford suggested. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
District Judge Jed Rakoff. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed, finding that such boycotts were significantly expressive such that an ad hoc balancing of the competing interests presented in the particular case was necessary. [read post]
