Search for: "Frye v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 12:53 pm by Kristen Matteucci
Updated regularly, this database provides an overview of over 60 “of the most-asked about and controversial legal topics in the United States” in chart format. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
The Court concludes therefore that there is insufficient evidence to show general causation.Federal and State Courts have consistently determined that the cause or causes of MCS (IEI) cannot be reliably established by scientific proof (see, e.g., Oppenheimer v United Charities of NY, 266 AD2d 116, 698 NYS2d 144 [1st Dept 1999]; Frank v State of New York, 972 F Supp 130 [ND NY 1997]). [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:30 am by Law Offices of Nancy J. Bickford, APC
Now the law throughout the United States, California has recognized gay marriage since 2008 (though only by those married during the window before Proposition 8 was passed) and then again in 2013 when the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Perry v Hollingsworth overturning the Proposition 8 prohibition. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:29 pm by Chuck Ramsay
It’s called a Frye-Mack hearing in Minnesota based upon two reported cases that outlined the procedure; United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:41 am by Anthony Franze and Jeremy McLaughlin
  The states and United States argue that, so long as the defendant has not been deprived a fair and reliable trial, there is no prejudice under Strickland. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am by Schachtman
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert is now over 25 years old. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:23 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In Chambers the United States Supreme Court held that a state's evidentiary rule is trumped by and cannot preclude a defendant form introduce reliable evidence consistent with his right to present a defense. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:43 am by Marissa Miller
With the Court set to hear arguments this week in two of the Term’s most anticipated cases – United States v. [read post]