Search for: "Hoffmann v. Hoffmann"
Results 61 - 80
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:22 pm
If, at this stage, damages are an adequate remedy for the claimant, "there are no grounds for interference with the defendant's freedom of action by the grant of an injunction" (as per Lord Hoffmann in National Commercial Bank Jamaica v Olint Corporation [2009] UKPC 16 at [16] - a Privy Council case) . [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:06 pm
But there is nothing in the Act to preclude an authority from deciding that it is reasonable for an applicant to continue to occupy accommodation which is temporary: R (Awua) v Brent LBC at 68 per Lord Hoffmann, approved in Birmingham CC v Ali (2009) UKHL 36, [2009] 1 WLR 1506 at (41), and followed in Muse v Brent LBC at (8). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Here is the schedule for the 2019 Health Law Professors Conference. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:46 am
” Cheney v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:22 am
” Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm
Canada In the case of Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 183 v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
Also see ---> Private student loan collection suit not removable to federal court (addressing state vs. federal jurisdiction issue in context of original collection suit; sanctions imposed for improper removal in Richards v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Selikoff received the Albert Lasker Clinical Medical Research Award for his work on the clinical trial of isoniazid to treat tuberculosis, along with Walsh McDermott and Carl Muschenheim, of the Hoffmann-La Roche Research Laboratories, and Edward H. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 10:41 am
Thorsten BauschSetting the record straight concerning the right to dependent claims under the EPC by Thomas Wyder and Stephan Steinmüller (Hoffmann Eitle) EPO Examiners sometimes urge Applicants to delete dependent claims considered to relate to “unsearched subject-matter” after having raised a unity a posteriori objection. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 1:24 pm
., v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
The Warner-Lambert v Actavis case concerning the drug pregabalin was heard by the Supreme Court in mid-February 2018 and considered, among other things, plausibility, infringement of second medical use patents and abuse of process. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:13 am
However, neither court commented on whether the EPO’s requirement that an overlapping range should have a technical effect is consistent with the UK novelty requirement established by Lord Hoffmann in Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham plc [2005] UKHL 59. [read post]
2 May 2018, 11:16 pm
" (Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:14 am
VEGF-Trap is therefore one of those improvements which Lord Hoffmann had in mind in Kirin-Amgen [2004] UKHL 46, [2005] RPC 9 at [117]. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:06 am
The case at hand, Frank Industries v. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 4:02 am
It's now 13 years since Lord Hoffmann told us definitively how to interpret patents claims, in his opinion in Kirin Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel [2005] 1 All ER 667. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:37 am
Much of the difficulty stemmed from the advice of the Privy Council in Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10, in which the Board, in an advice delivered by Lord Hoffmann, appeared to depart from the traditional strict tests for implication of terms in fact. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 7:07 am
Handed down by Henry Carr J on 21 November, Illumina v Premaitha considered aspects of Actavis and much more besides. [read post]
