Search for: "In Interest of Thomas" Results 61 - 80 of 15,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2024, 3:38 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Taking as a benchmark published decisions from 1.1.-3.6.2024, Daniel Thomas looked at 551 decisions, of which 502 decided on the validity of the opposed patent. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 12:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
Judge Robin Rosenbaum dissented, solely on the grounds that she thought plaintiffs lacked standing; those interested in this debate can see it in the full opinio [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Alito wants to play doubles pickleball with Ginni Thomas, Jesse Barrett, and Patrick Jackson on that same spot. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 9:00 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Grant & Thomas Steele, Restrictive Covenants: Florida Returns to the Original “Unfair Competition” Approach to the 21st Century, 70 Fla. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:48 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Friday morning read: Supreme Court rules official likely violated NRA’s free speech rights (Justin Jouvenal, The Washington Post) Supreme Court gives New Yorkers second shot in escrow interest-payment fight (Kelsey Reichmann, Courthouse News Service) Chief Justice John Roberts declines to meet with Democrats about ethics concerns amid Alito flag flap (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News) Supreme Court OT2023 at the End of May (Jonathan Adler, The Volokh Conspiracy)  How to… [read post]
30 May 2024, 11:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Of potential interest, only three of the 6-3 decisions issued thus far split the Court along traditional conservative-liberal lines. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Kagan was able to attract Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett (who also joined the majority opinion) but the three in the majority who didn’t seem to want to be associated with Kagan’s content were Thomas, Roberts, and Jackson (an interesting trio). [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
It is for this reason that we must subject all racial classifications to the strictest of scrutiny.Under strict scrutiny, all racial classifications are categorically prohibited unless they are necessary to further a compelling governmental interest and narrowly tailored to that end. [read post]
28 May 2024, 1:25 pm by Josh Blackman
It was a lesson he had learned from Thomas, his former boss and mentor, who was known to hold the line without deviation. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
The Media Bill has been passed by the House of Lords as one of the outstanding pieces of legislation rushed through Parliament following Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s decision to call a general election on 4 July 2024. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:18 am by Guest Author
  What’s more, even though the concurrence telegraphs a lack of interest in entertaining appropriations challenges in the future, lower courts do not enjoy the same flexibility in shaping their dockets. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:45 am by Dan Bressler
” “Gluck and Walrath did not give their investor clients written notice about the potential conflict of interest or get the clients’ written consent to the arrangement, thus violating state ethics rules, the Supreme Court’s Disciplinary Review Board wrote in its report to the court on the case. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
  But it wouldn’t be surprising if a remand invited the Arizona courts to take another look; the Court sure was interested in the question at argument. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, writes a blistering dissent from the denial of cert in which he asserts that “the decision below is nothing short of insurrectionist election interference. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Over at Balkinization, an interesting symposium on David Pozen's The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) has wrapped up. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:16 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“There is no legitimate government interest that would justify treating Perez in this manner while he was in medical distress. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:01 am by H. Juanita Beecher, FortneyScott
The court affirmed his $2.3 million back pay award along with 8% prejudgment interest and $1.1 million in front pay. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:01 am by H. Juanita Beecher, FortneyScott
The court affirmed his $2.3 million back pay award along with 8% prejudgment interest and $1.1 million in front pay. [read post]