Search for: "In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge" Results 61 - 80 of 1,357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
Sir Andrew McFarlane P ruled that: ‘…in the wholly unusual circumstances of this case, I consider that widespread media publicity with the aim of presenting the facts as found by a judge in a court of law is a necessary step in order to meet the private and family life needs of the mother and the children. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:13 am by charonqc
The occasional anecdotes, nervous cough and oddly frantic panting of Sir John soon raised concerns that the inquiry chairman was more an old-fashioned English eccentric than an interrogator filled with iconoclastic zeal. [read post]
27 May 2012, 6:40 am by INFORRM
  He said: “If you’re thinking of calling in the HMIC to investigate the police… you would always been relying to a large extent on the advice you’re receiving from the police as to why they are pursing this properly and why there is no reason to call anyone in to independently examine what they doing. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 4:29 am by Frank Cranmer
If such a request is made, a panel of five judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:42 am by Eoin Daly
Along with the recent Doherty case, which concerned the failure of the Government to allow for the moving of the writ for a Donegal by-election, this re-asserts decisively the jurisdiction of the Courts to intervene in what are sometimes otherwise conceived as essentially “political” matters conferred exclusively on the jurisdiction of the “political” organs within the constitutional order. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 6:14 am by Dan Bressler
“Federal Judge Disqualifies Baker McKenzie From Representing Russia’s VUZ Bank” — “Attorneys from Baker McKenzie have been disqualified from representing Russia’s VUZ Bank after a federal judge in Virginia determined a conflict of interest was present. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 1:08 am by INFORRM
The judge himself has pointed out that we have independent judges, and their arrangements are fixed by statute. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 7:21 am by Florian Mueller
"Despite my other concerns and reservations, I took a quick look at that decision and I understand that decision and the circumstances leading to it just the way Judge Alsup also describes that precedent. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:00 am by Jay Rivera
  Many critics feel that the clause creates a marsh of open-ended inquiries that judges might have difficulty navigating. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:32 am by Eugene Volokh
" "[T]his historical inquiry that courts must conduct will often involve reasoning by analogy—a commonplace task for any lawyer or judge. [read post]