Search for: "In Re Proposed Florida Appellate Rules"
Results 61 - 80
of 218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Lauderdale Division.Bankruptcy -- Confirmation -- Chapter 13 plan -- Good faith -- Chapter 13 debtors failed to carry their burden to establish confirmation of good faith plan where debtors purchased and financed vehicles shortly before their bankruptcy filings in contemplation of those filings, and then proposed chapter 13 plan which would repay the 910-day car claim at less than contractual interest rates such that plans were not proposed in good faith -- Confirmation denied… [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
Supreme Court of Florida.Rules of Juvenile Procedure -- Amendment -- Detention hearing -- Presence of counselIN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE 8.010. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 9:08 pm
In its proposed rule, the CFPB noted that many victims of trafficking have adverse credit information due to coercion and abuse. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 8:25 am
You’re going to use Wexis and it’s going to be OK, but you should learn how to grab the low-hanging fruit from the books and remember that you can never truly be a Wexis Ninja if you don’t know what things cost. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed a law eliminating previously required climate change considerations and prohibiting renewable energy programs and policies. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 7:53 am
Jason Ponder: Not at all, but Florida’s one of the very few states that still had, up until recently, permanent alimony. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
Appellant, vs. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
Here, as the postnuptial agreement was fair on its face and free from any fraud or overreaching, no hearing was necessary prior to ruling on the defendant’s motion. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
Here, as the postnuptial agreement was fair on its face and free from any fraud or overreaching, no hearing was necessary prior to ruling on the defendant’s motion. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:14 am
But the Third DCA ruled that Butchko failed to finish the hearing before signing the proposed order to show cause. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:29 pm
Res. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 8:15 am
(In re Matter of Adoption X.X.G and N.R.G., No. 3D08-3044) The ACLU, which represents Gill, has a case profile, and posts appellate briefs here.Marriage equality - D.C.The D.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
Concluding our series on the Florid Everglades proposed acquisition, using a lengthy New York Times piece as the principal resource (two others coming below), we’ve now reached the point where, if you’re like me, you’ve concluded that the deal has to be re-traded. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
., Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Gant in conducting the search STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
The Florida Med. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
If they think animals should have the right of copyright they're free, I think, under the Constitution, to do that. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:02 am
In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477 (Fed. [read post]