Search for: "J R Express" Results 61 - 80 of 4,130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
In other words, the reimbursement of a fee requires there to be special provision (see for example decision J 33/86). [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 7:54 pm by Howard Bashman
” Peter Zimonjic of CBC News reports that “Comedian who mocked disabled child singer did not breach limits of free speech: Supreme Court; Case pitted Quebec comedian Mike Ward against former child singer Jérémy Gabriel. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:42 am by Guido Paola
La requérante le confirme expressément en ces termes (voir page 2 de la requête en révision, lignes 10 et 11):  « La requérante s'est donc vue contrainte de renoncer à ses requêtes fondées d'annulation de la décision de la division d'opposition pour vice de forme. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:02 am by Douglas
Ironia e acidez “O texto em debate, já numa primeira leitura, chama atenção por extrapolar os limites da objetividade, os quais em certos casos comportam o uso de expressões ácidas e irônicas e até adjetivos desabonadores. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 10:19 am by Ben
” But this year’s delegation to Jérémie was particularly close to GJEL’s daily mission. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:08 am
This installment of the New Jersey Legal Update podcast is an interview with Adam J. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:40 am by Jessica Kroeze
The reason cited was that the "decision by the receiving Office to restore the right of priority based on the criterion of unintentionality has no effect in proceedings before the EPO (R. 49ter.1(b) PCT) and no valid request under Rule 49ter.2 PCT has been filed".In an accompanying letter, the Receiving Section took the view that, even though the incorrect box had been crossed in the letter dated 4 June 2015, the intention of reminding the applicant had been expressed. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
OF Aro-II:While there is much to be said in favor of both views expressed in Aro II, the “holding in Aro II has become a fixture in the law of contributory infringement under [section] 271(c),” 5 R. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 10:46 am by Jack D
Voici le contenu d’un arrêté qui va intéresser beaucoup d’entre nous qui sommes des automobilistes, j’ai donc choisi de vous en faire part. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:07 pm
J'avais évoqué il y a peu la requête en récusation formulée dans l'affaire R12/09 de tous les membres de la Grande Chambre, au motif qu'étant également membres des Chambres de recours techniques ou juridique, ils avaient un intérêt personnel et pouvaient être soupçonnés de partialité. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
There are three clauses of the Bill of Rights Bill [pdf] which, if enacted in their current form, would have a direct impact on freedom of expression cases. [read post]