Search for: "Janssen v. Janssen" Results 61 - 80 of 385
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2019, 1:42 am
The IPCom guidance are provided for readers' convenience at the end of this post.The IPCom factors have since been applied in Actavis v Pharmacia [2014] EWHC 2265 (stay was ordered), and Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences [2016] EWHC 313 (stay was not ordered) (IPKat post here).David Stone (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge), applied the IPCom guidance to the fact of the case in Coloplast v Salts. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
   In Janssen v Teva (2009) the Federal Circuit stated that mere plausibility does not suffice to meet this requirement, if it did then patents could be obtained for little more than “respectable guesses”. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 1:15 pm by Zachary Silbersher
Patents covering an antibody are often claimed by the antibody’s function (the residues where it binds to the antigen) rather than its structure (amino-acid sequence). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 11:18 am by Howard Knopf
(https://www.blacklocks.ca)Blacklock’s will be back in the Federal Court tomorrow on December 12, 2018 at 90 Sparks St. in Ottawa at 9:30 AM with a “mega” motion record of almost 3,000 pages. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 6:15 pm by Schachtman
Pledger v Janssen Pharms, Inc., Phila. [read post]
16 May 2018, 9:00 am by theadm
The case is Rayanne Regmund Chesser, Gloria Janssen, Michael Newberry and Carol Newberry v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 10:05 pm
Searle LLC (2) Janssen Sciences Ireland UC [2017] EWHC 987 (Pat). [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:29 pm by Dennis Crouch
In re Janssen and NYU  (Johnson & Johnson) (Fed. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2017 Pa. [read post]