Search for: "LAMB v. UNITED STATES"
Results 61 - 80
of 165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 11:00 am
This decision is similar in many respects to the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Fernandez v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:14 am
United States, but the case is all about Amy. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
(affirming a finding of direct infringement where a jury“could have reasonably concluded that . . . more likelythan not one person somewhere in the United States hadperformed the claimed method”); see also Broadcom Corp.v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:28 pm
On November 20, 2013, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California rejected a challenge by various plaintiffs and upheld the biological opinion and incidental take statement issued by the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 8:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 1:34 pm
Mensing case was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) on June 23, 2011. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 1:35 pm
This is because no such drug injury cases are being filed for those women, much less settled, because at the present time one cannot successfully sue a generic drug manufacturer due the Pliva, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:39 pm
(Schofield v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 1:15 pm
The Mirena IUD was first marketed in the United States in 2000. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
It goes back to the Schofield decision to ascertain just what those "neutral principles" are:As the Schofield Court recognized:These neutral principles include First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations (see Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
For example, if A has sued B in state court for trademark infringement, and the case is about to be decided, a federal court should stay proceedings in the case of B v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:16 pm
So too is the popularity of DIY backyard slaughter, local “slaughter farms,” and mobile slaughter units (MSUs), which bring the slaughter to the animal owner. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:45 pm
MERCK & CO., INC., Defendant, Civil Action No.: 1:08-cv-4119, is scheduled to start on January 14, 2013 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ("SDNY") United States District Court Judge Joseph F. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:58 pm
At Least, This November 2012 Article In The New England Journal Of Medicine Makes The Point That Something Needs To Be Done Soon, Rather Than Later (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) The June 2011 ruling by our United States Supreme Court in Pliva v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:39 pm
By letter dated August 20, 2012 from the office of the United States Attorney for the Western District of Louisiana, the Court was advised that HHS/CMS would not participate in the hearing. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
Merck & Co., Inc., 06 Civ. 9455 (JFK), case is set for a new jury trial on damages before United States District Court Judge Joseph F. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
Merck & Co., Inc., 06 Civ. 9455 (JFK), case is set for a new jury trial on damages before United States District Court Judge Joseph F. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
KF 1609 K75 2012 International trade law and domestic policy : Canada, the United States, and the WTO / Jacqueline D. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:22 am
United States, 346 F.3d 386, 388 (3d Cir. 2003). [read post]
