Search for: "National Steel Corp. v. Long" Results 61 - 80 of 112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937) (federal regulatory power extended to intra state activities that could cumulatively have a substantial effect on commerce);  Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:57 am by Marissa Miller
Steel Corp., a recently granted case which asks what constitutes “changing clothes” within the meaning of Section 203(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937) The “activity” test will almost always be relevant only to the third type of use of the Commerce Clause. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:42 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
 These transactions included: Kinder Morgan’s US$38 billion acquisition of El Paso Corp. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Kiera Flynn
Petitioners’ reply   United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 pm
" Nippon Steel Corp. v. [read post]