Search for: "People v. Berger" Results 61 - 80 of 191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Some of those very people, however, said Esposito’s claims are greatly embellished, or simply not true. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
If you think of a “legal” doctrine as a rule according to which people adhere their behavior and pursuant to which parties can resolve disputes, executive privilege has not been a legal doctrine at all. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 at 1512; see Mahran v Berger, 137 AD3d 1643, 1644 [4th Dept 2016]; Weiss, 120 AD3d at 1551). [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
   If most of the people I write about are extremists, then postwar movement conservatism -- and perhaps conservatism per se -- are extremist. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 4:01 am by Alice Woolley
Lawyers help people access their rights and entitlements within the legal system. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Berger v Rokeach  2017 NY Slip Op 27374  Decided on November 20, 2017  Supreme Court, Kings County  Silber, J. answers these questions with a strong degree of specificity. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
Hence Black’s decision to say little on the history of impeachment—in striking contrast with his contemporary Raoul Berger, who took a scalpel to the subject in a well-received 345-page tome the preceding year. [read post]