Search for: "People v. Rea" Results 61 - 80 of 464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2016, 9:02 am
However, to ascertain that these particular injuries were caused by the accused, the prosecution had to show the “mens rea” for causing death and separate it from “mens rea” of committing rape, which due to the lack of evidence and problems with the admissibility, it could not. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 1:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit considered the level of mens rea - or intent - required by the federal identity theft statute. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am by Anita Davies
In the case preview for R v Gnango , it was suggested that the question facing the Supreme Court read like a particularly complex examination problem. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:00 pm
In People v Hawkins (2008 NY Slip Op 09254 [11/25/08]) the Court of Appeals provided counsel with further guidance as to what is required to preserve errors for review as a matter of law. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The New York Court of Appeals has thrown out a conviction because the defendant's profanity did not create any public disturbance.The case is People v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Immigration Law: People Smuggling & AdmissibilityB010 v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
Regarding Section 230, the court glibly says “court rulings are now consistent that Section 1595 requires an actual knowledge mens rea for participation in a venture. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am by MBettman
” Ohio Constitution Article I Section 2 provides that ‘[a]ll political power is inherent in the people. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 1:58 pm by Kent Scheidegger
In cases where status is not obvious, we could be severely punishing people who did not intend to do anything wrong, i.e. had no mens rea. [read post]