Search for: "People v. Thomas (1979)"
Results 61 - 80
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
As the Divisional Court recently said in Bishop v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:57 am
The volumes were presented to the Law Library during a lecture given by Professor Thomas Glynn Watkin. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:25 am
Thomas Porteous). **** According to most reports, as far as the FBI investigation is concerned, there are only two statutory provisions in play: (1) 18 U.S.C. s. 1924; and (2) 18 U.S.C. s. 793(f). [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Thomas A. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
It is a story of corporate maneuvering and high-stakes litigation, as Thomas Edison and [p. 1894] his competitors employed patents as weapons in their battle to dominate the electrical industry. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
Weisman; Justice Thomas is known for his argument that the state and local governments are not bound by the Establishment Clause, as in his concurrence to Town of Greece v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:52 pm
Additional Resources: High-speed police chases have killed thousands of innocent bystanders, July 30, 2015, By Thomas Frank, USA Today More Blog Entries: De Los Santos v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
(See also Matter of Benjamin Thomas v Comm. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
(See also Matter of Benjamin Thomas v Comm. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:37 pm
The healthful tuber was much maligned since the cruel phrase “couch potato” first appeared in the LA Times in 1979. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
You can read the opinion, and the dissent from denial of rehearing en banc, here (with the dissent — by Judge O’Scannlain, joined by Judges Thomas and Bea, included first). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm
In Ruin and Redemption, Thomas GW Telfer analyses the ideas, interests, and institutions that shaped the evolution of Canadian bankruptcy law in this era. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
For a case discussing the distinctions between these two types of warnings in detail, read Thomas v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
In the 1979 case of Addington v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Kendall v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:09 am
Thomas v. [read post]
