Search for: "ROSE v. FOSTER" Results 61 - 80 of 115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2014, 5:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As one footnote, note that the pivotal "research exemption" case of Madey v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 8:35 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> White Stallion Energy Center v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Foster (Political Science, Oregon State University-Cascades) reviews Gordon K. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/bzlq2iE9Tw -> Court Sides With Dish Over ABC in DVR Fight http://t.co/eJjx0XOLah -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-09-18: Digital media, copyright and the law – Moneyweb v Fin24 http… http://t.co/kCYbHaUnDI -> MPAA Says Google Fosters Piracy http://t.co/0ZCRlxmDvh -> Don't Forget to Raise Equitable Arguments in Software Audits http://t.co/RCGOgXKqyW -> What Is More Important: Our Privacy or National Security? [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:42 am
§ 1415(l):  "In short, Stewart's gross-misjudgment theory of liability—premised on sexual abuse fostered by the district's alleged disability discrimination—does not appear to seek damages 'as a substitute for relief under the IDEA'"(citing the Ninth Circuit's relatively recent decision in Payne v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 2:30 am by Lorene Park
Considering an average sales year (as opposed to her minimum), the number rose to $500,000. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:46 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
Acuff-Rose Music (the “Pretty Woman” case) but no judges have, up till now, taken the hint. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
Internationalization and regulation of law firms In 2011 Macleod Dixon merged with the international law firm Norton Rose LLP. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
”  For example, Newt Gingrich’s patron Sheldon Adelson and Rick Santorum’s patron Foster Friess are individuals, not corporations; they are currently contributing through Super PACs protected by Citizens United, but they otherwise could spend on their own even without that decision. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Domestic Relations Law § 240 (1-b) and Family Court Act § 413 (1) were amended by Laws of 2011, Ch 436 to correct these anomalies and to codify the decision in Rose v Moody. [read post]