Search for: "Reason v. General Motors Corp." Results 61 - 80 of 665
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
Even more encouraging, the majority looks to Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388, p. 301 (1963–1964), for defining the “general duty of care includes a duty to warn when the manufacturer “knows or has reason to know” that its product “is or is likely to be dangerous for the use for which it is supplied” and the manufacturer “has no reason to believe” that the product’s users will realize that danger. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 10:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP v.Toyota Motor Corp., No. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:58 am by Jesse Mondry
(GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
The rules of evidence permit expert witnesses to rely upon inadmissible evidence, at least when experts in their field would do so reasonably. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Con independencia de la necesaria aclaración sobre el alcance de la frase expuesta, en este análisis acerca de la posible práctica ilegal de la profesión por nuestros abogados y abogadas en una jurisdicción a la cual no están admitidos por vía de una página web será preciso en cualquier caso constatar, como parte de los elementos constitutivos de esta cuestión, si en efecto estos y estas están ejerciendo lo que… [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
How obvious it is to the general public that the recalled product is deficient. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am by Schachtman
Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713, 718 (7th Cir. 2000). [8]  Bixby v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:28 am by Cari Rincker
General Motors  Corp. 181 Ill.2d 112, 121 (1998) (stating that “a potential litigant owes a duty to take reasonable measures to preserve the integrity o relevant, material evidence. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:06 am by Ronald Mann
When a motor failed at the Alabama facility, Fives rejected Outokumpu’s complaint, arguing that any fault lay with Fives’ subcontractor, GE Energy Power Conversion France (a French subsidiary of General Electric that had built and installed the motor). [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:29 am by Ronald Mann
GE France relies generally on the deeply seated policy in favor of arbitral resolution of disputes and specifically on the Supreme Court’s holding in an earlier case, Arthur Andersen v. [read post]