Search for: "Robert Clinton v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 627
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
In each case, I will state my position briefly; repeat the critique; and where I can, rebut it. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Roberts presided in the Senate—just as Chief Justice William Rehnquist presided over the Senate trial of President Bill Clinton in 1999.It is not hard to see why the Vice President must temporarily step aside when the sitting President is on trial. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Chief Justice Roberts withheld his fifth vote from Justice Breyer’s plurality opinion, concurring only in the judgment. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
United States, and US Airways v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Roberts’s invocation of stare decisis per Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 8:41 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Hobby Lobby Stores Bush v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 9:28 am
Kelsey Clinton analyzed oral arguments in the Supreme Court’s Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am
One particularly high-profile case is that of Kristine Gebbie, President Clinton’s chief AIDS policy officer. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 2:00 pm
" As Chief Justice Roberts's analysis in King v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm
He was quite transparent in stating his basic assumption for all his analyses; namely, the outcomes for the two Democratic candidates, Clinton and Biden, for the two major party candidates, Clinton versus Trump and Biden versus Trump, and for in-person and for mail-in voters were all randomly drawn from the same population. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm
He was quite transparent in stating his basic assumption for all his analyses; namely, the outcomes for the two Democratic candidates, Clinton and Biden, for the two major party candidates, Clinton versus Trump and Biden versus Trump, and for in-person and for mail-in voters were all randomly drawn from the same population. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am
Bush and Bill Clinton. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 11:44 am
The CFPB’s counsel also argued that the Ninth Circuit should follow its decision in CFPB v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:42 am
But as Justice Robert H. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:42 am
But as Justice Robert H. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Maolin Ninth Circuit Opinion (ACLU) United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 10:30 am
The president lacks the power to excise provisions from statutes, and in a 6-3 decision in Clinton v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts is a pragmatist. [read post]
