Search for: "Roche Holding Limited"
Results 61 - 80
of 181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2013, 5:06 am
See Hoffman–La Roche, 493 U.S. at 173. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:01 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Holding AG engaged in biotechnology research. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 2:38 am
We therefore hold that the appellant who works for a community which needs the medicine is definitely a ‘person interested” The locus standi objection is rejected." [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 3:32 pm
As best as can be discerned from the limited information available on eCourts, those motions resulted in a November 18, 2010 order denying plaintiff's subsequent motion to correct the motion record and holding that: (1) Charter Oak had breached the insurance policy; (2) that the plaintiff's alleged business failure (aka consequential damages) was not proximately caused by that breach; and (3) that plaintiff was entitled to money damages of $7,887.19, plus… [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:01 am
Hoffman La-Roche Ltd., 580 F.3d 1340 (Fed. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 11:46 am
CNA Holdings LLC 10. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 9:40 pm
The co-authors note that Roche holds no patents or exclusive licenses on the genes encoding CYP450 and that therefore any investment it makes in building the clinical evidence would also benefit rival companies who have entered the CYP450 market or are preparing to do so. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:10 pm
He began reading on his own, partaking of the “locker library” run by literary-minded inmates who trade well-worn paperbacks out of the metal chests that hold all their earthly possessions. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 6:48 am
How could a court ever hold that a “reasonable” patient should know more than their doctors? [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
On Wednesday 22 February 2012, Hildyard J dismissed an application for an injunction by Viagogo Limited in relation to a Channel 4 “Dispatches” broadcast. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 5:18 am
Roche Labs. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:13 am
We have reviewed the evidence that the parties presented to the jury, and we hold that it was within the jury’s purview to find that Roche was not liable. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
In Ragone, 595 F.3d 115, the Court of Appeals again confirmed the importance of the statutory rights analysis, indicating its willingness, if in dicta, to hold unenforceable an arbitration agreement containing a shortened statute of limitations and a fee-shifting provision that would “significantly diminish a litigant’s rights under Title VII. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
., Inc, Supreme Court No. 10-1150, to consider whether to set limits on when inventors can patent medical diagnostic tests. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:04 pm
Roche Holding Ltd. of Basel, Switzerland; F. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 10:07 pm
Roche, et al. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:27 am
" But the Supreme Court should affirm the Federal Circuit's holding on subject matter eligibility. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:30 am
: Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v DEMO Anonimos Viomikhaniki kai Emporiki Etairia Farmakon (IPKat) (The SPC Blog) Naprelan (Naproxen) – US: Lawsuit seeks to compel FDA compliance with PDUFA user fee waiver provisions: Stat-Trade v USFDA (FDA Law Blog) OxyContin(Oxycodone) – US: Purdue Pharma files patent infringement complaint against Ranbaxy in response to Para IV certification filing (Patent Docs) Plavix (Clopidogrel) – US: CAFC: Apotex… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
“Discretion is not whim, and limiting discretion according to legal standards helps promote the basic principle of justice that like cases should be decided alike. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:07 am
Roche Molecular Sys., 179 L. [read post]
