Search for: "STATE v. HASTINGS"
Results 61 - 80
of 998
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm
As Justice Alito’s 2017 majority opinion in Matal v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Cohen as income to the New York State tax authorities. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
The functionality or ideas that lie behind the code is protected (SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1482 at §20-§37). [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Putting aside rights that arise from contractual or other state-law guarantees of academic freedom, if a public employee is speaking (even on matters of public concern) while on the job, qua employee, then under the 2006 Supreme Court Garcetti v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:11 am
” “Galderma had asked V&E to withdraw, but it refused, citing a conflicts waiver that was part of the engagement letter Galderma had signed. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm
G expressed disagreement with the core of ISL—that elected state legislatures were freed of the state constitutions that created those very legislatures by virtue of something in the federal Constitution. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
[vi]The release does not offer any substantive explanation for why such haste is necessary. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
That mattered for the 2010 congressional-election cycle.An even more dramatic example is United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 1:54 pm
[v] CFIUS is a US government interagency committee that reviews certain transactions involving foreign investment in the United States to determine their effect on national security. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:30 am
Times Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
" United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
If we were to view it this way, the law would survive, according to cases such as Ward v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am
" Christian Legal Soc'y Chapter of the Univ. of Cali, Hastings Coll. of Law v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Mitchell, Why Was Roe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Stone, eds., Roe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Before 1929, all securities markets in the United States were private and thus, dark. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
The threats are everywhere: Congress, state legislatures, the Supreme Court, internationally. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
” We have to assume that this wheeze was dreamed up in some haste, meeting the immediate political imperative to respond to a strongly supported back bench amendment that tried to tack videos of boat crossings on to the Bill’s children’s duties. [read post]
