Search for: "Specialty Products Holding Corp." Results 61 - 80 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2020, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
Top defendants in that trial will be Jayson Jeffrey Penn, CEO of Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., and Mikell Fries, Claxton Poultry Farms president. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:11 am
Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association, 493 U.S. 411 (1990) and NYNEX Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Everest Minerals Corp., 362 F. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 788 F. 2d 741, 744–745 (11th Cir. 1986). [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 11:59 am by @ErikJHeels
(Newton, MA; David Platt,, President) Axis Specialty U.s. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:06 pm by @ErikJHeels
(Medford, MA; Osmar Bernardino, President) Bertelli Holdings Inc. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 8:18 am
"That's the first time we've seen that in a long time," says Jeffrey Grossman, a managing director at Wachovia Corp.'s legal specialty group, which conducted the survey. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
In Joiner, the high Court rejected WOE, over the dissent of a single justice,[5] but some of the inferior federal courts have embraced the dissent to the exclusion of the majority’s clear holding, as well as the incorporation of that holding into the revised Rule 702.[6] An interesting case of judicial disregard. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Boston, MA; Andrew Mccabe, President) 254 Realty Corp. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm by admin
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., 639 F.3d 11, 26 (1st Cir. 2011), which was decided four months after her passing.[8] Professor Berger’s contention about the need to avoid assessments of individual studies in favor of the whole “tsumish” must also be rejected because Federal Rule of Evidence 703 requires that each study considered by an expert witness “qualify” for reasonable reliance by virtue of the study’s containing facts or data that… [read post]