Search for: "St. Clair v. Circuit Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46) South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP) Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against… [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 11:56 am
App. 2016) (same), app. granted, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1442, 72 N.E.3d 656 (2017); Clair v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
In particular, he points to a staff memo written in April 1974, which argues that “the Supreme Court has contrasted the broad scope of the inquiry power of the House in impeachment proceedings with its more confined scope in legislative investigations. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 10:41 am
Clair County Housing Authority v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:36 pm
We thought the Seventh Circuit had put this issue to bed in Walton v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:36 pm
We thought the Seventh Circuit had put this issue to bed in Walton v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:36 pm
We thought the Seventh Circuit had put this issue to bed in Walton v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor)… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Trout of bounds: the effects of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals’ misguided Fifth Amendment takings analysis in Casitas Municipal Water District v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
This connection bridges law, legislation, government, custom, policy, and process.[1] And it touches on the connection with law producers and law protectors—for example courts, mediators, etc.[2] We do not approach that issue from the perspective of philosophy, but more practically from an institutional perspective. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
V Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm
The district court, affirmed by the Eighth Circuit, found that the use of the satellite dish made the system not “of a kind commonly used in private homes. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm
The district court, affirmed by the Eighth Circuit, found that the use of the satellite dish made the system not “of a kind commonly used in private homes. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:00 pm
The district court, affirmed by the Eighth Circuit, found that the use of the satellite dish made the system not “of a kind commonly used in private homes. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands… [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:14 am
Court Requires Specificity for eDiscovery in Ford’s Contaminated Concrete Case –http://bit.ly/RnqNmH (eLessons Learned) Concluding Litigation Hold and Document Retention Policies are “Clearly Unacceptable,” Court Allows Depositions to Determine if Spoliation Occurred - http://bit.ly/PBClUr (K&L Gates) Court Focuses on Cooperation & Proportionality to Resolve Discovery Disputes - http://bit.ly/Rnmecf (K&L… [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
” Watkins v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am
Those issues relate to the federal courts’ jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution and to the courts’ ability to redress the wrongs alleged in U.S. interbranch disputes. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 5-6 June: USFDA public meeting on evaluation of product trade names: (FDA Law Blog), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 11 June: MARQUES ‘First meeting with Spanish Judges of the Community Trade Mark Courts’ – Alicante: (Class 46), 16 June / 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 &… [read post]
