Search for: "State of Maine v. Fisher"
Results 61 - 80
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am
Sidhu raises two concerns with the “critical mass” argument invoked to justify the affirmative action program under challenge in Fisher v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:25 am
Rather than just consenting to the jurisdiction of the federal and state courts of Maine, the dealer irrevocably consented and submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the State of Maine. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:22 pm
Fisher spent a grand total of 2 pages, and rightly so. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
Finally, a nod in the direction of the Oxford Human Rights Hub, whose most recent piece looks at the American Supreme Court affirmative action case of Fisher v University of Texas. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Supp. 1048, 1058, (D.D.C. 1987) (granting summary judgment against hospital strict liability claim under Fisher), aff’d in part & vacated in part on other grounds, 851 F.2d 437 (D.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
It is also an open question how the forthcoming decision by the Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am
The federal government filed an amicus brief yesterday in Fisher v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:05 pm
The Court will hold a hearing on the case of Fisher v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:58 am
See Cook v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:38 am
The Expansion of 'Medicaid' under the ACA is Unconstitutional26 states challenged the provisions of the ACA that dealt with the Medicaid programme and one of the main reasons was the impact it would have on the federal funding they would receive under it. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Main Chamber. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
Monday brought bad news for the petitioner in the once-relisted Fisher v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
” State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:58 am
The main significance of Behrend v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SAN State of MI v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
Fisher, the Supreme Court’s first case decided under that clause (2 Cranch at 396). [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 12:06 am
Fisher (1805), then in McCulloch v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:53 pm
The main conclusion to be drawn from Johnson v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
That would be incredible even if Fisher was not born in 1970. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
